Abstract
Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) often leads to decreased muscle strength and mass, impairing physical performance and causing disability. Interventions with resistance exercise (RE) is an effective non-pharmacological approach to mitigate these issues. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of interventions with RE on muscle strength, muscle mass, physical performance, physical disability, and quality of life (QOL) in SSc patients, as well as to assess its adherence and safety.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on a PICOS framework: Patient = Systemic Sclerosis; Intervention = Resistance exercise; Study design = Randomized clinical trials. Searches were performed across MEDLINE (PubMed), PMC, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE up to January 2025.
Results: Ten randomized clinical trials, including 422 participants (~85% female), were eligible for analysis. Participants’ ages ranged from 42 to 64 years, with body mass indices between 22.5 and 28.0 kg/m2. The intervention period was standardized to 12 weeks. Interventions with RE significantly improved muscle strength (SMD = 2.76 kg; 95% CI, 1.32 to 4.20; p = 0.0002) and functional disability (SMD = -0.47; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.00; p = 0.05) compared to controls. Interventions with RE also showed superiority in the physical component of QOL (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.81; p = 0.03). Although enhanced physical performance was observed, statistical pooling was not possible due to limited data. Interventions with RE had a low incidence of adverse events, but data on disease progression and adherence were insufficient.
Conclusion: Interventions with RE benefits muscle strength, physical function, and QOL in SSc patients, though optimal protocols and adherence strategies need further investigation. More robust studies are required to refine training methods and enhance clinical trial designs.
Keywords: Muscle strength; Occupational therapy; Physical disability; Physical rehabilitation; Quality of life; Resistance training; Scleroderma.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent for publication: Not applicable. Human ethics and consent to participate declarations: Not applicable. Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process: During the preparation of this work the author(s) used Chat-GPT (chatgpt.com) and Deepl (deepl.com) in order to improve language structure, since authors are not English native speakers. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication. Competing interests: Authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest to write this research.